The lack of WMD really compromises the proposed imminence of harm that stood in the fore of many arguments favoring invasion. If one uses a benefit/burden calculus, the lack of WMD takes a huge chunk out of the expected benefit (i.e. greater world safety).
cmraynew
Mar 15 2006
09:56 pm
The lack of WMD really compromises the proposed imminence of harm that stood in the fore of many arguments favoring invasion. If one uses a benefit/burden calculus, the lack of WMD takes a huge chunk out of the expected benefit (i.e. greater world safety).