I didn’t elaborate on what I meant by Mr. Shiavo’s right to happiness. He must think that happiness comes from his wife’s death. That way he can keep the money from the legal settlement from his wife’s accident and the subsequent medical malpractice and marry the woman who’s given birth to his children without being a polygamist, which I have to believe is still illegal in Florida, but you gotta wonder. This is why he isn’t willing to let her parents just take care of her. I’m sure he’d be ecstatic to have her out of his life, but that would mean he wouldn’t get any of the money.
That right seems dubious in light of the right that precedes it in the list – life.
Warrior
Mar 25 2005
04:04 pm
I didn’t elaborate on what I meant by Mr. Shiavo’s right to happiness. He must think that happiness comes from his wife’s death. That way he can keep the money from the legal settlement from his wife’s accident and the subsequent medical malpractice and marry the woman who’s given birth to his children without being a polygamist, which I have to believe is still illegal in Florida, but you gotta wonder. This is why he isn’t willing to let her parents just take care of her. I’m sure he’d be ecstatic to have her out of his life, but that would mean he wouldn’t get any of the money.
That right seems dubious in light of the right that precedes it in the list – life.