catapult magazine

catapult magazine
 

discussion

Kill Bill

Default

ByTor
Oct 11 2003
11:57 am

Random thoughts.

Visually the movie is spectacular.
I liked the anime.
It’s hard to tell whether the story will have any substance until Vol. 2 comes out.
Loved Uma.
Cool soundtrack as expected.
If I cut off someone’s arm does it really spray blood in all directions like that?
In Pulp Fiction, it seemed like there was actually less violence in the movie than the audience thinks there is (much of the violence was implied – left to the audience’s imagination). In Kill Bill, it seems like there is more violence than the audience thinks there is (much of the violence is cartoon-like or shown in black and white or shown as silhouette).
Don’t anyone dare compare the fight scene in this movie to the fight scene in the Matrix Reloaded.

Default

grant
Jan 13 2004
06:33 am

I don’t mean to be too hard on Tarantino, though. Eccentricity is an important aspect of being an artist. In order to be as good at film-making as Tarantino, you have to love movies. You have to want to watch all kinds of films and appreciate many forms of film. The fact that Tarantino spends most of his life watching and making films does not make him “idolatrous” (and when I throw this word around, it sounds like a heavier accusation than it should; you’re right that a statue to Baal is only a finely hewn piece of wood or stone). But when a person uses film the way Tarantino does (he says that when he’s lonely in a hotel room, he’ll rent “Dazed and Confused” because the characters are like friends of his and he can always spend two hours with them if he gets too lonely), I question his motives as a director. If I had gone to see Kill Bill only to see a movie, only to experience a few moments of surprise and to enjoy the style and the various winks and nods at the genre films Tarantino is referencing, what’s the point? That just doesn’t seem like enough. But that seems to be all Tarantino needs to be satisfied and all he thinks his audience needs to be served at the movie theatre. The fact that Tarantino enjoys movies so intensely—that I have NO problem with. That’s what I do like about Tarantino. But I wish he loved me as an audience member in a better way than this sado-masochistic relationship he seems to think we have. I don’t want to be in that kind of relationship with a director. I’ll take Kubrick’s truth of the evils of violence any day over Tarantino’s honesty of the pleasure of it. (But I’ll take Tarkovsky’s celebration of the image or Bresson’s humility over Kubrick’s own reincarnations of ancient Greek myths)

Default

DvdSchp
Jan 13 2004
08:44 pm

Well, I think maybe we can be hard on Tarintino. I saw it again a few weeks ago, and I have a theory about it and it works off what Grant has been saying here. The only worthwhile thing about this movie, I think, is that it provokes some good questions about how we watch movies in general. I personally think this movie exists just screws with film critics, a S&M relationship of a different nature. I hesitate to say that Tanitino did this on purpose, but maybe he did.
One of the first things that struck me about it was that, not only did the advertising use the phrase “The 4th Film by Quentin Tarintino,” it’s actually in the film’s titles. At first I thought, “that takes balls.” No director says things like “the 4th film” in the movie itself, at least that I know of. It’s so arrogant, but you know what, it’s pertinent, I think. It’s film critic language, or maybe it’s cinephila language, and I know he subscribes to auetur theory. So anyway, that appears at the beginning of the film, and what follows is an amalgemation of kung-fu, speghetti westerns, yakuza flicks—all b-movie genres.

The difference between Kill Bill and his previous movies is that they were crime pictures which have a complex web of ancestors within film history including prestigious genres such as film noir and French new wave. Tipping your hat to Truffaut and Godard (which he does extensively) will always get you noticed by critics. The other difference is simply that his other movies are much more “talky” and this one is definately more visual, and quite often critics don’t know what to do with very visual films, violent or otherwise, besides saying they are “stunning” or “beautiful.” Kill Bill hacks through any Tarintino-esque dialogue like so many arms, heads and legs. All that cool discussion material has been thrown out in favor of action, and I think that he does this intentionally. Toward the beginning, when the Bride talks to the first DiVA, parts of the Bride’s speech feel like they’ve been translated into Japanese and back into English, and in fact, as she leaves, Sonny Chiba has some subtitled voice overs which have that oddly comic, formal, and slightly-off tone of translated Japanese. Much earlier in this dicussion, Jasonvb said that the dialogue “You didn’t think it would be that easy, did you?” “You know, for a minute there, yeah, I actually did.” didn’t exactly impress him. Me neither. It’s a stupid line. I don’t think that’s changed, but I do think that was exactly the point. As Grant pointed out, Tarninto has been responding to his critics who says he’s an ironic filmmaker, and he says he’s not, he actually loves this stuff. He’s using bad dialogue not only to subvert critical responses but also because he actually likes it.

Kill Bill seems to be a response to all the critical apraisals of his former films. He preempts them by taunting them with the “The 4th Film” bit and then proceeds to hack everything to pieces for the pure joy of it and asking us what we think of it all, isn’t it fun? I can’t help but think he’s been enjoying people trying to make sense of it. I don’t think you can, and I don’t think he wants you to, beyond simply enjoying the movie.
So when he ascribes the revenge quote at the beginning to the Kilingons of Star Trek as opposed to its proper place (I’l admit that I don’t know its actual origin), it is not important whether or not he actually thinks that’s where the quote actually comes from, which some ciritics have asked. What’s important is that he is quoting Star Trek; this is his melange and he doesn’t apologize for it. He loves film and this is his film, or perhaps his filmic love film to film. Grant says that Tarninto would have us bow down to the world of film, and I couldn’t agree more. Not only does it become idolatry, it borders on facism (which is not that much different, I guess).
I should probably qualify my previous ramblings about vengance movies. Yes, it can be a cry for justice, but it can quickly transform into facism. Taxi Driver, I think, does an excellent job of riding that line, but a movie like Dirty Harry actually scares me because it is power worship run amok. Death Wish followed, and so did the Rambo series, and others. Those are awful, ugly, wrong headed and evil films. Dirty Harry capitalized on the post 60’s “law and order” blacklash that Nixon also capitalized on. Rambo reassured America of its supremecy by revenging the memory of his comrades who died in Vietnam. What aboutTarintino/the Bride?
I guess I’ll have to see how it ends.
Although, I have feeling that Tarintino makes film and all things pop his fascist leader. Kino uber alles. It directs absolutely everything he does. The beginning, the end, and nothing in between.

By the way, I recently saw that someone is remaking Walking Tall, the 1973 vengence flick about a backwoods guy (played by Joe Don Baker) who gets fed up with his corrupt town, gets elected sheriff, and begins cleaning up the down with a two by four (I kid you not). The Rock will star as the ass-kicking vigilante. Check out the trailer and weep.

http://www.apple.com/trailers/mgm/walking_tall/

Default

ByTor
Jan 14 2004
11:36 pm

omg omg the rock and johnny knoxville in the same movie!!! lol!

Default

Adam
Jan 15 2004
03:11 pm

By the way, this is way late, because I’ve been away from the CPU for awhile, but . . .

I apologize, Jabird, for calling you a dirty idolator. I’m a dirty, dirty bath turd. I now understand your job and I will go to my corner for a while until I’ve thought about what I’ve done.

Default

grant
Dec 09 2004
02:21 pm

I’d like to publicly apologize to Mr. Tarantino for not believing he was up to any good with the Kill Bill movies. If he happens to read this, I’m sorry. I watched your Kill Bill, Vol 2 movie several weeks ago and now understand what you were doing with the first one. I love the whole East-West thing. I definitely am a Westerner, because I liked vol 2 much more than vol 1. I especially liked the last dialogue between Bill and The Bride. Everyone’s death was so fitting. You have proven that there are many many new ways to tell the old old stories.

Default

dansnook
Sep 11 2008
12:37 pm

_

Default

grant
Sep 11 2008
12:37 pm

Ok, so that’s another vote for Kill Bill being idolatrous? If we’re all in agreement on this, is that our final answer as Christians? Kill Bill is an idolatry of film. The Christians have spoken.

Default

grant
Sep 11 2008
12:37 pm

Ok, so that’s another vote for Kill Bill being idolatrous? If we’re all in agreement on this, is that our final answer as Christians? Kill Bill is an idolatry of film. The Christians have spoken.